How do liberals feel about gun control




















According to polling by Gallup last year, 88 percent of Democrats said laws governing firearm sales should be made more strict, up from 77 percent in and 63 percent in Bloomberg heads one of the most politically active gun control groups and has spent vast sums of money pushing his agenda in races around the country. All the Democrats running for president are seeking one form or another of gun restrictions.

But current frontrunner Sen. Bernie Sanders finds himself under attack for being too pro gun. David Yamane, a sociology professor at Wake Forest University who studies American gun culture, said polarization over the issue began in the s in the wake of the Gun Control Act of , which was enacted amid national outcry over the assassinations of Robert F.

Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. Subsequent efforts by the NRA to seize on gun rights as a partisan issue only heightened the divide. One Democratic president, John F. Kennedy, was actually a member of the National Rifle Association. Liberal gun owners, Yamane said, are generally newer to gun ownership and are less likely to be the stereotypical face of gun owners: older, white men. Kat Ellsworth, from Chicago, was firmly against firearms and favored gun-control until just a few years ago, when she went with a friend to a gun range and discovered a love for guns and shooting.

With the Illinois primary approaching in mid-March, she is leaning toward Sanders or Sen. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so.

You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www. Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads.

You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link.

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser such as a plugin , we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences. Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners.

They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device.

If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising. Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests.

This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools. If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page. A cookie is a small piece of data text file that a website — when visited by a user — asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information.

Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies — which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting — for our advertising and marketing efforts.

More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:. We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience.

You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. The post-Constitution leftist meme that paints such a proposition as lunacy is counterfeit; that right, as set forth in the Declaration of Independence, is historical fact, and the Second Amendment was included specifically to give that guarantee teeth.

So city gun ownership purchases are different from country gun ownership purchases? So non-gun owners simply misunderstand [ie. So the government is the biggest problem, not a solution. So the ground-breaking news is? Duh, the states that are actively attempting to restrict ownership have created a movement of citizens attempting to preserve their freedoms and prevent themselves from becoming felons overnight by overzealous ideological governments.

Boston University should be ashamed to be trumpeting this as anything more than straight propaganda. The ACLU advocates for peoples constitutional rights by lobbying and fighting legal battles against unconstitutional legislation, and legaly challenges both federal and state agencies violations of peoples constitutional rights. Wich obviously by each challenge show Americans that their elected officials cannot be trusted by passing legislation in violation of the constitution. It also constantly challenges Federal agencies claiming their actions violated a persons or groups constitutional rights.

In short it shows that we must question and not entirely trust our goverment. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Why is that concept so hard for the researchers to grasp? The 2nd amendment is not for hunting or recreation. It is for exactly what the study revealed: to keep states with over reaching governments scared and accountable to we the people. Progressives stance on gun control reminds me a great deal like Progressives stance on drugs i.

What does that tell you? Did BU ever think that Maybe states, such as New York and Massachusetts, have very low recreational and self-defense gun cultures but very high Second Amendment activism because they have such restrictive gun laws! Your email address will not be published. Boston University More Publications. The Brink. July 15, Michelle Samuels. Twitter Facebook.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000